英語板対応スレ@Wiki 竹島

メニュー

資料Links

行動

記事スクラップ





意見要望



html plugin Error : このプラグインを使うにはこのページの編集権限を「管理者のみ」に設定してください。


※上記の広告は60日以上更新のないWIKIに表示されています。更新することで広告が下部へ移動します。

Rocky Relations

But to Japan (which calls the islands Takeshima) and South Korea (which calls them the Dokdo) these rocks carry a symbolic importance that belies their practical insignificance.
Both countries have claimed the islands as their own for more than a century, and in recent weeks the historic squabble has leapt once more to the forefront of bilateral relations.
After two days of intense negotiation, the two sides avoided a high-seas skirmish,
thanks to a last-minute deal in which Japan postponed its survey and Korea agreed not to submit its name proposals.

Would sanity prevail?
Hardly. Korean President Roh Moo Hyun reignited the dispute last week with a spectacularly inflammatory televised speech.
"Japan's present claim to Dokdo is an act negating the complete liberation and independence of Korea," he declared.
"This is a matter where no compromise or surrender is possible, whatever the costs and sacrifices may be."
Roh's speech, with its bitter reference to Japan's "criminal history of waging wars of aggression and annihilation,"
was a powerful reminder of how emotionally charged such disputes can be-and of how strained the relationship between Korea and Japan has the potential to become.

The modern history of the dispute over these islets dates to 1900, when Korea formally declared them as its own.
Five years later, the Japanese countered by claiming them as well. In 1910, Japan annexed mainland Korea,
making it a Japanese colony for the next 35 years.
In the aftermath of Japan's defeat in World War II, the Treaty of San Francisco did not mention the islands in the list of surrendered Japanese territories,
a fact that the Japanese use to bolster claims that the islands are still theirs.

But in 1952, Seoul declared that the islets were within Korea's borders and ordered the arrest of any Japanese boat that crossed the so-called "peace line."
South Korea built a lighthouse and a helipad on the islands, and stationed coast guards there.
A string of showdowns followed before Japan and South Korea normalized relations in 1965: Korea seized 300 ships (mostly fishing boats), and made 4,000 arrests, resulting in one Japanese death and dozens of injuries.
When the countries finally formalized ties, they excluded mention of the islands from the treaty-an act of expediency that continues to haunt them.

One reason why the dispute has erupted again is that Roh has been under considerable political pressure at home.
Kim Jaebum, a professor of diplomacy at Yonsei University in Seoul, says the liberal President has been widely perceived as soft on Japan
  • a political liability at a time when his beleaguered Uri party is preparing for hotly contested local elections in May.
"He had to step it up," says Kim. "The Korean people were waiting for an explicit expression from the President."
Sure enough, Roh's strident speech has been greeted enthusiastically at home, with an editorial in the Korea Times hailing it as "the toughest ever on Japan."

In Japan, Roh's diatribe initially inspired shock, followed by rationalizations and finally indifference.
The Asahi Shimbun newspaper called the speech a "dangerous development," but Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi downplayed it,
saying his government would respond "in a cool-headed manner."
Unimpressed, last Friday Korea's Foreign Ministry rebuffed Koizumi's suggestion that he and Roh hold a summit meeting to help heal the rift.
Japanese papers like the Nishi Nihon Shimbun have attributed Roh's pugnacity to his domestic political concerns, suggesting that Japan need not take his speech too seriously:
"An uncompromising stance against Japan plays well into the anti-Japan nationalist sentiment of the people, which could improve his low approval ratings."
One columnist openly doubted that Roh had the guts to make good on his threats, should Japan call his bluff.

Akihiko Tanaka, a professor of Eastern culture at the University of Tokyo, says Roh's speech and Japan's breezy dismissal of it demonstrate
just how differently the two countries see the legacy of Japan's colonial past."
For Japan, this is a territorial issue and little more," Tanaka says.
But for Korea, it's a matter of history and justice.
"To them, it's another show of how Japan is not owning up to its past."
In Korea, bitter memories of Japan's colonial occupation live on, harbored by people at the highest levels of government.
Lee Hye Hoon, an opposition lawmaker in South Korea's National Assembly,
says it's difficult for Japan and Korea to get along because "they attacked us, raped us, took everything from us ...
and they still don't apologize."

Dokdo is actively promoted in Korea as a prime example of Japanese aggression,
with the islets viewed as one of the first of Japan's many 20th century land grabs.

Korean kindergartens teach children songs about Korea's glorious eastern islands, the Dokdo.
In 2005, almost 20,000 Korean tourists (including one wedding party) visited the islands, even though it's a $350-per-person, five-hour boat trip from the mainland.
According to a report by Peter Beck, the Northeast Asia project director for the International Crisis Group,
"One would be hard pressed to find a single Korean over the age of five willing to admit that control of Dokdo does not matter."
By contrast, says Hideshi Takesada, a professor of Korean politics at Japan's National Institute for Defense Studies,
"most people in Japan have no knowledge of the issue," and little appreciation of how deep Korean resentment runs.

In fact, Japanese society is still in thrall to the Korea Wave, a surge of interest in Korean pop, films, TV dramas and design that first overtook the nation in 2002,
when the two countries co-hosted the World Cup and bilateral relations were at their best. Many Japanese politicians,
meanwhile, seem either incapable of understanding Korean ire toward Japan or simply don't care.
This further fuels the cycle of resentment and distrust. In 2005, for example,
Shimane prefecture (the Japanese local government to which the nation claims the islands belong) passed an ordinance designating Feb. 22-the 100th anniversary of Japan's annexation of the islands-as Takeshima Day.
Yu Masuda, an administrator in the Shimane prefectural government, says the goal was simply "to generate some attention" within Japan for the region's fishermen who suffer from not being able to hunt in the disputed waters.

Yet the Korean response to Takeshima Day was overwhelmingly bitter, with the local government's initiative perceived as evidence of Japan's widespread,
unrepentant nationalism. Korean protesters set up anti-Japan campaigns, pulled students and athletes from Japan-sponsored tournaments,
canceled sister-city arrangements with Shimane towns and held demonstrations to discourage tourists from traveling to Japan.
The criticism of Japan turned into a self-fulfilling prophesy as Takeshima Day 2006 took on a more jingoistic,
anti-Korean tone due to Korea's anti-Japan response the previous year.

Though the vast majority of Japanese don't consider this island dispute a particularly pressing issue,
there are still plenty of tough-talking, right-wing Japanese politicians to confirm Korea's worst fears that the country is just itching to press its claims.

"There are probably no valuable resources under the islands," concedes Shigeru Ishiba,
a prominent conservative Japanese parliamentarian. "So it's a piece of rock." Nevertheless, Japan can't abandon this particular piece of rock,
Ishiba insists, because such "matters of territory are about national sovereignty."

From afar, of course, this rhetorical crossfire can seem almost comically absurd.
But as history has shown, it doesn't take much for a meaningless rock to become a battleground.
It's a lesson that both sides would do well to remember.

BY JIM FREDERICK | TOKYO: timeasia_webmail@timeinc.com

??With reporting by Toko Sekiguchi/Tokyo and Jennifer Veale/Seoul
From the May. 08, 2006 issue of TIME Asia Magazine
http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/article/0,13673,501060508-1189390,00.html



South Korea agreed to drop plans to register new names

The BBC's Charles Scanlon in Seoul says Japan's increasingly insistent claim to the islands has sparked nationalist fury in South Korea.
Emergency talks over the weekend led to a temporary and shaky compromise.
Japan called off its maritime survey after South Korea agreed to drop plans to register new names for trenches and ridges on the seabed.
Tuesday, 25 April 2006
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4941190.stm

竹島を占領したのがWWⅡの後というBBCのソース
Japan's and South Korea's claims go back centuries,
but islands occupied by S Korea since 1953
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4921358.stm

国際司法裁判所から逃げているという韓国側のソース
Announcement of South Korea government
In a related development, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade in Seoul
announced that it deposited a declaration of optional exceptions to legal dispute
settlements with the United Nations on April 18.
http://www.korea.net/News/News/NewsView.asp?serial_no=20060420035

日本の判事がいるから不公平と言う場合には、国際司法裁判所規定
Statute of the Cort
Article 17
1. No member of the Court may act as agent, counsel, or advocate in any case.

2. No member may participate in the decision of any case in which
he has previously taken part as agent, counsel, or advocate
for one of the parties, or as a member of a national or international court,
or of a commission of enquiry, or in any other capacity.


SCAP 677には

6. Nothing in this directive shall be construed as an indication of Allied policy relating to the ultimate determination of
the minor islands referred to in Article 8 of the Potsdam Declaration.
SCAP 1033には
5. The present authorization is not an expression of allied policy relative to ultimate determination of national jurisdiction, international boundaries or fishing rights in the area concerned or in any other area.
と言う記述があり、最終決定はサンフランシスコ条約となります。
サンフランシスコ条約では、竹島は韓国の領土に含まれず、
韓国大使が竹島も含むように要求したが、ジョージフォレスター・ダレス大使は
「この通常無人島である岩島は、我々の情報によれば朝鮮の一部として取り扱われたことが決してなく、
1905年頃から日本の島根県隠岐支庁の管轄下にあります。この島は、かつて朝鮮によって
領土主張がなされたとは思われません。」として断った。


S. Korea Shows Contested Isles to Press (No Japanese Allowed)

ABOARD THE SAMBONGHO ? Even before the boat left the dock, the South Korean
flag was unfurled and passengers lined up to pose for photographs against the backdrop
of the banner fluttering in the wind.

The coast guard boat Sambongho was on its way to Dokdo, a cluster of sparsely inhabited
islets 134 miles off the east coast of the Korean peninsula that have inspired much
nationalistic flag-planting in their day.

Dokdo is the source of perennial squabbling between South Korea and Japan, but never
more so than in the last two months as Japanese nationalists started pressing their
claim to islets they call Takeshima.

To solidify its hold on the rocks it has controlled since the 1950s, South Korea arranged
a tour for foreign correspondents: Americans, Britons, Chinese, a Russian and a Singaporean,
that is. No Japanese were included, although they make up the largest contingent of
foreign correspondents in Seoul.

The Japanese claim has turned Dokdo into something of a national obsession in South Korea.
People have taken to wearing Dokdo T-shirts, sneakers and even underwear. The islets' image
dangles from key chains and mobile telephones. Both South and North Korea have issued Dokdo stamps.
The phrase Dokdo-nun uri ttang ? Dokdo is our land ? has become a national mantra.

"Dokdo is a breakthrough issue for us. We are showing our dynamic energy just like we did
with the 2002 World Cup," Park Hyeong Ju, a 28-year-old government employee who was
carrying a South Korean flag, explained on the boat.

Park was referring to the soccer tournament held in Japan and South Korea that brought millions
of Koreans into the streets.

No issue since then has so united South Koreans, not even North Korea's declaration that it has
a nuclear bomb. Whereas tens of thousands of Chinese demonstrated recently against Japan's
approval of history textbooks that glossed over its brutal treatment of its Asian neighbors before
and during World War II, South Koreans saved their ire for the Dokdo issue.

Koreans make much of the natural beauty of Dokdo, describing it in ever more hyperbolic terms.
True to its billing, Dokdo is striking, with twin peaks rising steeply from the sea like upside-down
ice cream cones. The mist gives it an ethereal quality.

"Ah, yes, it is a beautiful island. They say that heavenly gods have visited there," exclaimed
Kim Byung Ryul, a historian from the Korean National Defense University.

But natural beauty aside, Dokdo isn't much of a prize. Most likely, Koreans wouldn't even know where
it was if not for Japan's claim, admitted Lee Seong Jin, who runs a museum of Dokdo memorabilia
on the nearby South Korean island of Ulleungdo.

"We wouldn't have to think twice about it if Japan weren't making a fuss," Lee said.

The small rocks are barely habitable, with little fresh water and terrain so steep that peaks had to
be blasted away to create flat surfaces for building.

For all but about 40 days a year, rough surf and wind make the islands inaccessible. Last month,
the South Korean government started permitting tourists to visit, but heavy waves often keep the
boats away.

Of course, the Japanese have their own arsenal of maps and documents that they say prove their ownership.

Nevertheless, the islets today remain firmly in South Korean hands, and there seems to be little that Japan
can do about it. South Korean police and coast guard officers say they don't fear a Japanese attack on
the islets. Instead, the biggest hazards are the 20-foot swells and an anticipated influx of South Korean
tourists traipsing over the delicate volcanic rock.
"We're afraid too many tourists will destroy this place," said Lee, the museum director.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-dokdo29apr29,1,1300719.story?coll=la-headlines-world&ctrack=1&cset=true


添付ファイル